Legal Opinion

People v. Coon

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1940No. Crim. 3214PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A rehearing was granted in this cause as to appellant Fred C. Zeismer in order that we might give further consideration to the claim that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction and that the record failed to disclose proof showing the value of the property allegedly taken as charged in count 2 of the indictment. (36 Cal. App. (2d) 469 [97 Pac. (2d) 1006].)

In an indictment returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles County appellant and two others were charged jointly with the offense of grand theft in two counts. Following appropriate waiver of jury and submission of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. MacIelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. LandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. RicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. CoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MatlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. PillsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API