Legal Opinion

State v. King

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1917No. 21,249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the. court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The appellant was convicted of the murder of one William Sutton. The abstract he presents is very incomplete and inadequate^ but there is a statement that the appellant is without means and that his counsel was obliged to pay the expense of the appeal, and for that reason did not abstract all the evidence or all the proceedings. We are not informed as to the degree of murder of which defendant was convicted; and only fragmentary and unrelated portions of the evidence are furnished, although there is a contention that the evidence is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GeroldIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Minich v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. State v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Madison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. State v. SpikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Saunders v. CowlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. State v. KrutzfeldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Weaver v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API