Legal Opinion

Sandman v. Dakota

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 30, 1992No. 1:91-cv-00269PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

Two actions brought by Darlene A. Sandman against Judge Bradley Dakota were consolidated before this Court. In 2:91-cv-269, plaintiffs Darlene A. Sandman and Frederick D. Shelifoe (“plaintiffs”) claimed that Judge Dakota violated plaintiffs’ due process rights by sending their children to foster care in Minnesota and by continuing to make decisions about the children’s placement and treatment without affording plaintiffs notice or an opportunity to be heard. The relief plaintiffs requested was an order returning the children to the custody of Darlene Sandman or an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poodry v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Acres Bonusing, Inc v. Lester MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Penn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. LaBeau v. DakotaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  5. Margaret A. Penn v. Frank LandisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API