Legal Opinion

Bonilla v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 23, 2009No. 3D09-3209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny the defendant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus arguing ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. However, to preserve the defendant’s rights, we certify direct conflict with Montgomery v. State, - So.3d -, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), which is currently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court. State v. Montgomery, 11 So.3d 943 (Fla.2009).

Habeas corpus denied; conflict certified.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2009

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leggett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Bonilla v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. LUMSDON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Solano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Bonilla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API