Legal Opinion

Biltz v. Marymount Hospital

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1997No. 70725PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s claim is a medical claim under R.C. 2305.11(D)(3), which states:

“ ‘Medical claim’ means any claim that is asserted in any civil action against a physician, podiatrist, or hospital, against any employee or agent of a physician, podiatrist, or hospital, or against a registered nurse or physical therapist, and that arises out of the medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of any person.”

In Rome v. Flower Mem. Hosp. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 14, 635 N.E.2d 1239, the Ohio Supreme Court interpreted this language to include actions arising from procedures that were “ancillary” and “inherently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rome v. Flower Memorial HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Akers v. AlonzoOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Holmes v. Community College of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Headley v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API