Legal Opinion

Hinchman v. Gillette

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2005No. 31760Published

1Opinion of the Court

618 S.E.2d 387 (2005)

Charlotte HINCHMAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Paul Z. Hinchman; Charlotte Hinchman, individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants,

v.

Julie M. GILLETTE, R.N., C.R.N.A., individually, and as the agent, servant and/or employee of Medical Doctor Associates, Inc., and as the agent, servant, and/or employee of Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital Company; Medical Doctor Associates, Inc., a foreign corporation doing business within the State of West Virginia; Roger K. Pons, M.D., individually and as the agent, servant and/or employee of Stonewall Jackson Memorial…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. State v. DerrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hinkle v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API