Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Union Bank Trust Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 14, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, having obtained an appeal from a decree of the White Chancery Court and having lodged a certified copy of the decree in this court, now asks the court to make an order directing the stenographer who took in shorthand a report of the oral testimony in said cause as required by act 267 of the Acts of 1925, to make and file with the clerk of said chancery court a transcript of his stenographic notes as required by said act. See Acts of 1925, p. 823. He asks that the court direct said stenographer to prepare and deliver said transcript of his notes, free from costs, in forma pauperis.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rindlaub v. RindlaubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schofield v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Cass v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API