Legal Opinion

Knight v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1931Published

1Per curiam

Petition of appellant for mandamus to require clerk to prepare a complete transcript of the record, including* the indictment and all papers on file in his office, is granted. Petition for mandamus to require stenographer to transcribe his notes is denied, it being the duty of the circuit court to do that.

Mandamus from this court in aid of its appellate jurisdiction is an appropriate remedy to spur the clerk to the performance of his duty to prepare a complete transcript of the record in his office in order that the case may be reviewed here. In re Barstow, 54 Ark. 551, 16 S. W. 574; Bell v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BarstowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Bell v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Reynolds v. Union Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API