Linda Kesting v. James Kesting
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentW. Jones, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the Court’s holding that the QDRO issued by the magistrate court was valid.
A QDRO is a form of relief that is only valid when made pursuant to domestic relations law. Here, the magistrate court was presented with a private contract governed by contract law and enforceable through contract remedies. When the parties entered into the contract, it was fully within their power to avail themselves of the protections of domestic relations law. They explicitly chose not to do so. Accordingly, by issuing the QDRO the magistrate court has: (1) completely ignored the obvious…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- BORLEY v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Maslen v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Spencer-Steed v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Bainbridge v. BainbridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.