Legal Opinion

Cho v. City Of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 31, 2022No. 5:21-cv-05503Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ANTHONY SUNG CHO, Case No. 21-cv-05503-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE APRIL 8, 2022 10 v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE RODRIGUEZ DEPOSITION 11 CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 30 Defendants. 12 13 14 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute regarding whether defendant Matthew 15 Rodriguez may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination as to certain 16 matters expected to be raised during his deposition in this case. Dkt. No. 30. The Court finds this 17 matter suitable for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Jane Doe, a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian and Mother, Alisa Rudy-Glanzer v. Elroy "Bud" Glazer, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Pablo Trejo-Zambrano, United States of America v. Jesus Fierro-Soza, United States of America v. Frank Fierro-SozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United Liquor Co. v. GardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API