Legal Opinion
Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 26, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 248 (1953)
96 A.2d 92
MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TEL-DISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT, AND MORRIS S. SEGAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MORRIS S. SEGAL AND SEAMARK REALTY COMPANY, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS ON COUNTERCLAIMS OF THOR CORPORATION.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 16, 1953.
Decided March 26, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and JAYNE.
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Thor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Groel v. United Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daoud v. Kleven Investment Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954