Legal Opinion

Bell v. . McJones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Peebles, J., May Term, 1909, of Beaueobt. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The feme defendant, Lydia Jones, wife of M. M. Jones, owned a lot in Belhaven, which fronted on "Water Street of that town. The plaintiffs introduced a deed to her for this lot, which showed that it' was 65 feet wide and 250 feet deep. The plaintiffs alleged and offered evidence tending to show that M. M. Jones proposed to sell them this lot, which was called by them the “Sam Wilkinson lot,” and in consequence of this offer and subsequent negotiations the plaintiffs agreed to buy the same and pay therefor the sum of $1,000; that defendant, M. M. Jones, thereafter produced a deed for it, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Finishing & Warehouse Co. v. OzmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hodge v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Boyd v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Bridgers v. . BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Michael v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Arnette v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Council v. PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API