Legal Opinion

Michael v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, at May Term, 1908, of CATAWBA, obtained a judgment against J. O. Moore, one of the defendants, for $300 and costs in a suit for damages for malicious prosecution. At the time the judgment was taken the defendant J. O. Moore owned a tract of land in Alexander County. He gave notice of appeal from the said judgment to this Court, being allowed time within which to perfect such appeal, which appeal was not, in fact, prosecuted. Before the time for perfecting said appeal had expired, and before the plaintiff caused a transcript of said judgment to be docketed in Alexander County,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. . CulbersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoqueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Burton v. . FarinholtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. McCanless v. . FlinchumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Trefethen v. LynamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Nye v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Scott v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  5. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API