Sauer v. Traeger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, William Traeger, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, 'Thomas Canty, J., made January 28, 1893, denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This action was brought to recover the possession of personal property, or, in case possession could not be had, then for the value thereof. Ho writ of replevin issued, and plaintiff ■did not take or obtain actual possession of the property. Upon the trial the plaintiff recovered the following verdict: “We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find for the plaintiff and against the ■defendant, William Traeger, for the possession of the following described personal property, described in the complaint herein, to wit, “horse, harness," quarter and knee boots, sulky and runners, or the sum of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barton v. LovejovSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Stevens v. Wisconsin Farm Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Barkey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- North Star House Furnishing Co. v. RinkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904