Legal Opinion

North Star House Furnishing Co. v. Rinkey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1904No. Nos. 13,864—(207)Published

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, Finehout, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of' defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.2

Action in replevin, brought in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover the possession of a range with certain fixtures belonging thereto, in which defendant had a verdict on trial in that court, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The facts are substantially as follows: .On December 6, 1902, defendant entered into a contract with plaintiff for the purchase of the range in question, which provided, among other things, as follows:

This agreement witnesseth that I, Alex. Rinkey, have purchased of the North Star House Furnishing Company (a cOr*81poratio…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pabst Brewing Co. v. ButchartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Sauer v. TraegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API