Legal Opinion
Glover v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 2, 2001No. A99A0389PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
In Glover v. State,1 this Court considered the effect of OCGA § 42-8-34.1 (c), which allows a trial court to revoke the remainder of a defendant’s probation for violation of a special condition of probation “imposed pursuant to this Code section.” We concluded that no special conditions of probation are in fact “imposed pursuant to” OCGA § 42-8-34.1, and overruled as wrongly decided two prior cases in which panels of this Court had suggested the contrary.2 We noted, however, that the Supreme Court, in Gearinger v. Lee3 and Manville v. Hampton 4 had applied the statute in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension Fund v. ChristySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Gearinger v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Security Life Insurance Co. of America v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Manville v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chatman v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001