Gordon v. Gordon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in entering the order modifying a previous custody order without a finding of substantial change in circumstance affecting the welfare of the child. This contention has merit.
G.S. § 5043.7(a) provides that an order of a court of this State providing for the custody of a minor child may be modified upon a showing of changed circumstances. “However, the party moving for modification of a custody order has the burden of showing that there has been a substantial change of circum stances affecting the welfare of the child.”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- King v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Searl v. SearlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hollandsworth v. KnyzewskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- O'Briant v. O'BriantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.