Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1980No. 798DC933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in entering the order modifying a previous custody order without a finding of substantial change in circumstance affecting the welfare of the child. This contention has merit.

G.S. § 5043.7(a) provides that an order of a court of this State providing for the custody of a minor child may be modified upon a showing of changed circumstances. “However, the party moving for modification of a custody order has the burden of showing that there has been a substantial change of circum stances affecting the welfare of the child.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Rothman v. RothmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. King v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Searl v. SearlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Hollandsworth v. KnyzewskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. O'Briant v. O'BriantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API