Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Ragsdale

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1896No. 1,856Published

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Ross, J.

The appellee, in bis complaint, seeks to recover damages from the appellant for a breach of its common law duty as ,a common carrier for hire, in the transportation of a horse.

Tbe appellant, in addition to an answer of general denial, filed a special answer as follows :

Tbe defendant further answering, and each paragraph thereof, says : Tbat on tbe 27th day of July, 1894, tbe plaintiff did ship by tbe defendant’s road three certain horses, from tbe station at Bedford, Indiana, to Osgood, Indiana, a station on defendant’s line in Ripley county, Indiana; tbat tbe…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OrrIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Hill v. Boston, Hoosac Tunnel, & Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API