Legal Opinion
Gresham v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 22, 1980No. 1-780A194PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
OPINION ON REHEARING
In our opinion handed down November 10, 1980, 412 N.E.2d 118, we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded this cause for a new trial. We held that knowledge on the part of a person charged with uttering a forged instrument that the instrument is forged remains an essential element of the offense of uttering a forged instrument under the provisions of our new penal code (Ind.Code 35-43-5-2). We reversed the trial court for refusing defendant’s tendered instruction on guilty knowledge as an essential element of the offense which the state must…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Whitacre v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Faught v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Estep v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Toliver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Payton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- City of Lawrence Utilities Service Board, City of Lawrence, Indiana, and Dean Jessup, Individually and in His Official Capacity v. Carlton E. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- City of Lawrence Utilities Service Board, City of Lawrence, Indiana, and Dean Jessup, Individually and in His Official Capacity v. Carlton E. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016