Legal Opinion

People v. Giles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

Under People v Molineux (168 NY 264 [1901]), the People generally may not introduce evidence that the defendant has committed an uncharged crime. Evidence of uncharged crimes attributable to the defendant is admissible, however, if relevant, to prove motive, intent, absence of mistake, identity or common plan or scheme (id. at 293). The list of relevant considerations warranting the admission of uncharged crimes evidence is merely illustrative, not exhaustive, and such evidence may also be used to establish an element of the crime charged (People v Alvino, 71…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. TillNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GilesNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. VanlareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. RamnarainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API