Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Pellerin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 26, 2010No. 2010-082Published

1Dissent

Johnson, J.,

¶ 15. dissenting. Today, the Court holds that a “notice” of a prosecutor’s intent to request a sentence enhancement under 13 V.S.A. § 11, introducing a mere possibility that a defendant will face a life sentence following a conviction, is enough to reverse our normal presumption that an accused should remain at liberty pending trial. Such a holding undermines the presumption of innocence for those who stand accused of crimes and greatly expands the category of cases in which the presumption of release is reversed, a category we have explicitly noted should be narrow. For this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Singleton, Carlos T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. State v. MorishigeHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API