State v. Pellerin
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Johnson, J.,
¶ 15. dissenting. Today, the Court holds that a “notice” of a prosecutor’s intent to request a sentence enhancement under 13 V.S.A. § 11, introducing a mere possibility that a defendant will face a life sentence following a conviction, is enough to reverse our normal presumption that an accused should remain at liberty pending trial. Such a holding undermines the presumption of innocence for those who stand accused of crimes and greatly expands the category of cases in which the presumption of release is reversed, a category we have explicitly noted should be narrow. For this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Singleton, Carlos T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. MorishigeHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.