Legal Opinion

Aronoff v. Pioneer Mutual Compensation Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 24, 1956No. 17718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Aronoff and Eastis, to whom we will hereinafter refer as plaintiffs, as members and policyholders of Pioneer Mutual Compensation Company, to which we will refer as the company, brought suit for themselves and all others similarly situated seeking injunctive and declaratory relief in connection with an alleged illegal assessment levied upon them. They also sought, on behalf of the company, to recover losses alleged to have been sustained by illegal conduct on the part of certain officers and directors of the company in transactions with Simpson & Company, Inc., and Insurance Service Company.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Union Insurance v. HogeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. White v. . HaightNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. People ex rel. Palmer v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Benham v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Aronoff v. CarraherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Apodaca v. CarraherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Hoshour v. ApodacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Apodaca v. CarraherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API