Legal Opinion
Schott v. Ingargolia
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1938No. 16677PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment dismissing their suit for damages as against the defendant Alex L. Redden on an exception of no right or cause of action. The pertinent allegations of their petition are as follows:
That on October 5, 1935, while one of the plaintiffs, Mrs. Mumme, was a guest in the premises 4739 Dauphine street in the city of New Orleans, having been invited there by the owner, Lawrence Ingargolia, she sustained serious personal injuries when the building collapsed as a result of vices and defects in its construction. They further averred that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Curtin v. SomersetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Burke v. WerleinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Lee v. Powell Bros. & SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Cunningham v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Mahon v. SpenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kendrick v. MasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Marine Insurance Company v. StreckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- King v. MasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Lionel F. Favret Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Marine Insurance Co. v. StreckerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.