Legal Opinion

Application of Edward C. Filstrup, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 31, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of. Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejeetion by the Primary Examiner of claims 22 to 25 inclusive, 41, 42, 43 and -45 of appellant’s application Ño. 256,-877 for a patent on a'blasting device, The following references are of record:

Vick 174,035 Feb. 22, 1876

Woodruff 1,835,921 Dec. 8, 1931

Corley 2,006,791 July 2, 1935

Hayward 2,083,709 June 15, 1937

Christensen 2,180,795 Nov. 21, 1939

Berry 2,314,683 Mar. 24, 1943

Loving, Jr. 2,636,437 Apr. 28, 1953

Swed 2,648,282 Aug. 11, 1953

Swiss Patent 177,010 Aug.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WildingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. Application of Francis Trigg ParfreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API