Legal Opinion
Beech v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1934No. 6055PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWernette, J.
This action was instituted to recover on a surety bond, given upon the issuance of a temporary restraining order in another action.
December 27, 1922, one R. A. Bowman, commenced an action against respondent, Tom Beech, and one L. R. Adams. The action arose out of a disagreement over a contract for the purchase and sale of a number of sheep, then in the possession of respondent and Adams. At the time of filing the action Bowman prayed that respondent and Adams be enjoined from loading and shipping the said sheep. A temporary restraining order was issued, ex parte, and an order to show cause…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boise Valley Construction Co. v. KroegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Rowland v. Kellogg Power & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- McGuire v. Post Falls Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Pay Less Drug Stores v. SuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Beech v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Laundry, Dry Cleaning, Dye House Workers Union, Local 3008 v. Laundry Workers International UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.