Legal Opinion

In re Inter-City Associates, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Inasmuch as this application to quash a subpoena duces tecum was made in the Supreme Court, it is a civil proceeding, and is accordingly appealable (People v. “ Doe ” [Byk], 247 App. Div. 324, affd. 272 N. Y. 473; Matter of Ryan [Hogan], 306 N. Y. 11; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 1, par. [a]).

The Appellate Division has dismissed the appeal, but in its opinion stated that if it “ had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal *1045on the merits, it would affirm the order ”. We agree that the Special Term order should be affirmed (Matter of Manning v. Valente, 272 App. Div. 358, affd. 297 N. Y. 681;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Ryan (Hogan)New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. People v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Matter of Manning v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. People v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Matter of Mohawk Overall Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. INTER-CITY ASSOCS., INC. v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re NorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API