Legal Opinion

In re Norris

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

This is a motion by one James D. Norris to quash or modify a subpoena, issued by the District Attorney of New York County, requiring Norris to appear before a Grand Jury which is investigating the sport of boxing. The motion is based upon Norris’ claim (supported by certificates of a physician) that “ any unusual, physical, emotional or mental effort would be deleterious to petitioner’s health and possibly to his life ”.

The District Attorney takes the position that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to entertain this application. In the event that the court should hold to the contrary and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Di BrizziNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Matter of Ryan (Hogan)New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Schneider v. AulisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. People v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. People v. . WashorNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PugachNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API