Legal Opinion

DeMary v. Rieker

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 16, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Marie DeMary and Louis DeMary, instituted the within action for personal injuries they each suffered as a consequence of Chase Manhattan Services Corporation (Chase) ordering repossession of a leased Mercedes automobile. On September 4, 1991 at approximately 5:30 a.m., plaintiffs were awakened by their son, who told them that someone was taking their car. All three went outside, saw William Rieker (Rieker) attaching the Mercedes to a tow truck, and became very upset. Mrs. DeMary was standing on the passenger side of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. General Finance Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marcus v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Rand v. Porsche Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Callaway v. WhittentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Pingaro v. RossiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API