Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Mineola Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Whedbee, J., at August Term, 1912, of GUILFORD. Civil action. From a judgment of nonsuit tbe plaintiff appeals. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe per curiam opinion.

1Per curiam

Defendant’s attorney moves in tbis Court to dismiss tbe appeal and affirm tbe judgment for tbe absence of a properly constituted case on appeal.

Tbe stenographer’s full notes of tbe trial in tbe Superior Court are copied in tbe record. Immediately following them we find tbe following entry: “Tbe record, stenographer’s notes, tbe judgment and tbe exception to tbe nonsuit shall constitute tbe case on appeal to tbe Supreme Court.”

Tbis is not signed by either tbe presiding judge or by tbe counsel for tbe plaintiff or defendant. It is repudiated by tbe counsel for tbe defendant in tbis Court, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skipper v. Kingsdale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Wray Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Casey v. East Carolina RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API