Commonwealth v. Meadows

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The appellee was convicted following a bench trial on charges of aggravated robbery and burglary. The court subsequently granted a motion in arrest of judgment 1 based upon insufficiency of the evidence, and from that order the Commonwealth appeals. We reverse.

In reviewing an appeal from a trial court’s grant of a motion in arrest of judgment our task is to determine whether the evidence offered by the Commonwealth was sufficient to support the verdict. Commonwealth v. Froelich, 458 Pa. 104, 326 A.2d 364 (1974). “To sustain the trial judge, we must find that, ‘. . .…