Legal Opinion

Ex parte Dickerson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1891No. 3741PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Guadalupe. Tried below before Hon. James Greenwood, County Judge. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The relator was convicted of a misdemeanor, and fined $100 and given a term of six months in the county jail. The only irregularity complained of in the judgment was its omission to *449order the issuance of execution for the fine and cost. Capias pro fine issued upon this judgment, and the relator was arrested and placed in jail.

He resorted to a writ of habeas corpus for his discharge. Upon the hearing of the writ the county attorney moved to dismiss the same, which motion was-sustained, and relator was remanded to custody.

The point relied on by the relator for his discharge is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Darrah v. WesterlageTexas Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Ex Parte Tuan Van TruongCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ex parte LargentCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Ex Parte JarvisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API