Armstrong Cork Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum Works
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge. Suit by the Armstrong Cork Company and others against the Ringwalt Linoleum Works. From a decree dismissing plaintiffs’ appeal (235 Fed. 458),' plaintiffs appeal.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the plaintiff’s bill in pursuance of an opinion reported at (D. C.) 235 Fed. 458. In view of the important and far-reaching commercial questions raised in this case, we feel that they can better be approached and decided in this court after, full proofs and final hearing. Following our usual course in such a situation, we express no present opinion on those questions, and confine "ourselves to reversing the order made below dismissing the bill, and remanding the case, with directions to reinstate the bill, overrule the demurrer, without prejudice to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armstrong Cork Co. v. Ringwalt Linoleum WorksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Royal Baking Powder Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
- Searchlight Horn Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
- Manhattan Shirt Co. v. Sarnoff-Irving Hat Stores, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Publicker v. ShallcrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.