Legal Opinion

Close v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1939No. C. D. 151PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dallinger, Judge:

This is a suit against tbe United States arising at Spokane, a subport of the port of Seattle, Wash., brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on a particular importation comprising 25 complete bicycles shipped in a knocked-down condition. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “bicycles and parts thereof, not including tires.” It is claimed that the collector should have treated each bicycle part as a separate tariff entity, assessing duty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silvine Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Berg Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Close & Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API