Legal Opinion
Simpson v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 3, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00682PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOYNER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of Defendant T.D. Williamson, Inc., (“TDW”) and the Court finds the motion is denied for the reasons set forth herein.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simpson v. T.D. Williamson Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Sean Deckard v. Interstate Bakeries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013