Legal Opinion

Davis v. Roadway Express, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1989No. 16321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue involved on this appeal is whether the posting in its drivers’ room by Roadway Express, Inc. (Roadway) of a .safety rule requiring its drivers to wear seat belts was posting in a conspicuous place on the employer’s premises as required by § 287.120.5, RSMo 1986, V.A. M.S., which reads as follows:

*669Where the injury is caused by the willful failure of the employee to use safety devices where provided by the employer, or from the employee’s failure to obey any reasonable rule adopted by the employer for the safety of employees, which rule has been kept posted in a conspicuous place…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacOn-atlanta State Bank v. GallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Davis v. Roadway Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Carney v. City of DaphneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hussey Copper Ltd. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Higgins v. D.W.F. Wholesale FloristsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Brockmeyer v. Stieferman Bros. Van & StorageMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API