State v. Ward
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWelbaum, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, Defendant-Appellant, Brian J. Ward, appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of Possession of Heroin and one count of Tampering with Evidence. Ward contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence, because he was unconstitutionally detained by the police and *128because his consent to search was involuntary.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court did not err in overruling Ward's motion to suppress evidence. Both Ward's initial and second encounters with a police officer were consensual, and Ward voluntarily consented to a search.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WeisgarberOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PackOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. CelayaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. MalloryOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.