State v. Haskins
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
These consolidated appeals are from defendant’s jury conviction of first degree robbery (§§ 711.1 and 711.2, The Code 1979) and from the denial of his subsequent petition for postconviction relief. Because the outcome of the trial was not affected by the matters of which Haskins complains we affirm the trial court.
I. Haskins strongly complains of the tactics employed by the prosecutor. He points to a number of incidents which, taken together, he believes entitled him to a mistrial. The first of these incidents was a very suggestive identification procedure which was carried…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. CunhaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- State v. PoynerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. BigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. UbaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Bircher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.