Legal Opinion

People v. Breckenridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1992No. H008358; No. H008997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1098Opinion

CAPACCIOLI, J.

Statement of the Case

Defendant Patrick Breckenridge appeals from a judgment entered after he pled guilty to lewd conduct with a child and admitted a 1976 prior serious felony conviction for a similar offense. (Pen. Code, §§ 288, subd. (a), 667, subd. (a), and 1237.5.) He received a six-year term for the lewd conduct and a five-year enhancement for the prior serious felony conviction. He seeks reversal of the enhancement, claiming that his admission of the prior was invalid due to an inadequate advisement of rights.1 (See In re Yurko (1974) 10 Cal.3d 857, 863 [112…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. RiberoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. ArwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Marcotte v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Boehm v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BreckenridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API