Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Risenhoover
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 26, 1970No. 43606PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
The decisive question is whether claimant, John A. Risenhoover, was engaged in hazardous employment as defined by the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 85 O.S. Supp.1967, Sec. 2.
On August 20, 1968, claimant was an employee of Arthur Kelley. Employer, Kelley, was engaged in buying and selling hogs. He bought hogs in Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota; hauled them in his trucks to Muskogee, Oklahoma, where he unloaded, fed, and watered the hogs for two or three days before reloading the hogs for transportation and sale to packing plants in Texas and Oklahoma.
Employer’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Colbert Mill & Feed Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Melton v. A. C. F. Wrigley, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Thomason v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beall v. Altus Public School DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. PatchWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Murray State College v. AkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Beall v. Altus Public School DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- H. & R. Disposal Service v. HendricksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.