Legal Opinion

Iowa City State Bank v. Claypool

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,512PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*249The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The defendant, a druggist at Williams-burg, a town of about five hundred inhabitants, found himself in possession of a copy of a document indicating that he had ordered and given a promissory note for about fifty dozen packages of perfumes of various kinds amounting to $189.75. He notified the company that it need not ship the goods. The document mentioned is a composite affair printed in various sizes of type and containing along with other items a guarantee, a warranty, a list of things given free, and a blank order for the line of perfumes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. SwartsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Ort v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Hilligoss v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toelle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  2. Sheerer v. KanavelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API