Iowa City State Bank v. Claypool
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*249The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
The defendant, a druggist at Williams-burg, a town of about five hundred inhabitants, found himself in possession of a copy of a document indicating that he had ordered and given a promissory note for about fifty dozen packages of perfumes of various kinds amounting to $189.75. He notified the company that it need not ship the goods. The document mentioned is a composite affair printed in various sizes of type and containing along with other items a guarantee, a warranty, a list of things given free, and a blank order for the line of perfumes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. SwartsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Ort v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Hilligoss v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Toelle v. Sells-Floto Shows Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Sheerer v. KanavelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920