Jones v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The present case is a sequel to Selig v. Barnett, 233 Ark. 900, 350 S. W. 2d 176. We are here asked to decide whether the appellant Jones is entitled to an attorney’s fee for services rendered in that case; and, if so, how much fee should be allowed. The Trial Court allowed Mr. Jones a fee of Ten Thousand Dollars, and from that decree there is this appeal and cross appeal. A study of the opinion of this Court in Selig v. Barnett, supra, is essential to an understanding of the present litigation. Ben J. Altheimer is, and has been for many years, an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bayou Meto Drainage District v. ChaplineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Slayton v. RussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Sain v. BogleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bailey v. RaheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Carr v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. Guardianship of RatcliffCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Omdahl v. West Iron County Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bailey v. RaheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.