Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Goulbourne
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 26, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 2003, which ruled that claimant wqs disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a part-time toll collector for the Port Authority, was brought up on disciplinary charges for misrepresenting that she could not work on weekends due to religious reasons, calling in sick after working at another job and failing to report for her scheduled shift on five separate occasions without authorization. At the conclusion of a hearing held…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of SonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of GlowinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of BishopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of MandiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of CzosekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of Jung-SzayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006