Legal Opinion
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Ideal World Direct
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 2007No. 06 Civ. 4174(WHP)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY, III, District Judge.
Defendants Ideal World Direct, Marc Molinaro (“Molinaro”) and Matthew Ash-worth (“Ashworth”) move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, to sever the claims against each of them into separate actions. 1 For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
For purposes of this motion, the Court accepts the following allegations as true: Ideal World Direct and non-moving Defendant Peter Armstrong (“Armstrong”) operate websites at the domain names Flixs. net and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Capitol Records, LLC v. VideoEgg, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- NCR Corp. v. Korala Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. Mimi SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Burck v. Mars, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Levine v. Elliot Landy & Landyvision, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.