Legal Opinion
Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v. United Artists Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittont, J.
Defendant United Artists Corp. moves to dismiss the Village of Lynbrook action to enjoin defendants from showing “ Last Tango in Paris” in Lynbrook, New York, on the ground that CPLE 6330, under which the action was brought, is unconstitutional.
The pertinent part of CPLE 6330 is:
“ The supreme court has jurisdiction to enjoin the sale or distribution of obscene prints and articles, as hereinafter specified:
“1. The district attorney of any county, the chief executive officer of any city, town or village or the corporation counsel, or if there be none, the chief legal officer of any city, town,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Redlich v. Capri Cinema, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Monserrate v. Upper Court Street Book Store, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978