Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Writ of Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The defendant in error, the city of Chicago, brought two suits in the municipal court of Chicago against the plaintiff in error, the Chicago City Railway Company, to recover penalties,—one under an ordinance providing for transfers for continuous trips on the cars of the plaintiff in error within the city limits, and the other under the requirement that the plaintiff in error should post two or more notices in each car containing substantially so much ' of the section providing for .transfers as relates to transfer tickets. The cases were tried before the court without a jury and resulted in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Chicago v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Chicago v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API