Legal Opinion

BORDER BROKERAGE COMPANY v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 23, 1970No. C.D. 4052; Protest 67/13060-25224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Judge:

The merchandise of this protest consists of tomatoes exported from Canada and entered at the port of Blaine, Washington. The merchandise covered by entry 05-6525 consists of 200 cartons of 6x6 No. 2 tomatoes packed in 18-pound cartons, entered February 3, 1964, and classified in liquidation as entered under item 137.63 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States at the duty rate of 1% cents per pound. The merchandise covered by entry 05-11088 consists of 100 cartons of 6x7 No. 2 tomatoes packed in 18-pound cartons, entered June 16, 1964, and classified in liquidation as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The United States v. Oakville CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. VandiverDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Superscope, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. United States v. John V. Carr & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API