Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Maroyoqui
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2014No. 13-50066PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATFORD, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Dominguez-Maroyoqui pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The United States Sentencing Guidelines increase the defendant’s offense level for this crime when, among other things, the defendant has been convicted of an offense that’s both a felony and a “crime of violence.” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). Section 2L1.2 of the Guidelines defines the term “crime of violence” as any of a dozen specified offenses or, alternatively, “any other offense under federal, state, or local law that has as an element the use, attempted use, or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Roberto Ortega-Mendez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Juvenile FemaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Paul ParnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. George RafidiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- United States v. David DiazCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Rogelio Sanchez MolinarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.