Legal Opinion

Fife v. Jackson Material Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1942No. 29914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This case is presented on appeal from the district court of Muskogee county. It involves the review of a determination by that court that R. Johnson, one of several plaintiffs in the action, did not have such an interest in the controversy that he was entitled to join as a party plaintiff.

The determination complained of was by judgment of the trial court sustaining a motion to strike the name of R. Johnson as party plaintiff (which motion the trial court announced should be treated as a demurrer for insufficient facts) and dismissing the action as to him.

It is not essential to a determination…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lord v. Meadville Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Harry v. HertzlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Stinson v. HardyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Holt v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Bowles v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. White v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API