Legal Opinion

Holt v. City of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1924No. 3 Div. 668PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant sued appellee for the breach of a certain written contract, recovering a judgment for the full amount sued for, the trial court having given at his request the affirmative charge with hypothesis in appellant’s favor. A motion for a new trial was filed by the defendant, and upon consideration of this motion the trial court granted the same and set aside the judgment theretofore entered, and from the judgment of the court granting the motion for a new trial the plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

Counsel for appellant treat the ease as if count 4 alone appeared in the complaint, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. GratiotSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Williams v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Caldwell v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Riddle v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Stinson v. HardyOregon Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Vardaman v. Florence City Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ramos v. FellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. David Lee Boykin Family Trust v. BoykinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Lamken v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API