Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Thames Dyeing & Bleaching Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 10, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of nonsuit rendered upon the ground that the plaintiff had failed to comply in certain respects with an order for a more specific statement. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, while manager of the defendant’s plant, had advanced substantial sums to enable it to continue its operations, and in particular about $3700 for freight charges, about $525 for commissions to sales agents, about $2500 for pay roll payments, about $11,000 for raw materials and about $6000 for other necessary bills; and in a second count the plaintiff sought to recover about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Nickerson v. GlinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Gross v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Branson v. YearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Gibbs v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Mallory Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Bejda v. SGL Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kaye v. HousmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Henry v. Perkins, No. Cv94 31 37 15 S (May 1, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API